"We are committed to: The highest ethical standards. Uncompromising honesty and integrity." —The Windermere Mission Statement "In the real estate business somebody's word is very important. If you say you're going to do something, you've got to do it." —Windermere CEO Geoff Wood's Public Affirmation

________________________________

 

Co-Owner of Windermere Mount Vernon/Skagit Valley and Windermere Anacortes Properties, Nate Scott; also Sales Manager Colleen Craig,

and Agent Meredith Laws of Windermere Anacortes Properties, Sued

for Fraud in Mysteriously Appearing “2nd Listing” Case

(Above L to R) Nate Scott, Windermere Anacortes Owner; Windermere Anacortes Sales Manager Colleen Craig; and Windermere Anacortes Realtor Meredith Laws.

Plaintiff Wendelin Dunlap of Skagit County, single mother of an autistic, special needs five year-old; and a Natural Spa & Body Care Products entrepreneur, filed a Complaint in NO: 09-2-00178-5 Skagit County Superior Court, against Windermere Real Estate / Anacortes; and Regal Hospitality, LLC, and naming as Defendants:

Nathan Scott, a licensed Washington State real estate broker; Owner and Branch Manager of Windermere Real Estate / Anacortes Properties / Terra Corp; Scott also co-owns Windermere Mt. Vernon, and;

Colleen Craig of Windermere Real Estate / Anacortes Properties, a licensed Washington State real estate salesperson, Windermere Anacortes Properties Sales Manager and;

Meredith Laws of Windermere Real Estate / Anacortes Properties, a licensed Washington State real estate salesperson, and;

Regal Hospitality, LLC, a Washington State limited liability company, 419 Commercial Ave., Anacortes, WA 98221; original borrower and seller of 401 Commercial Avenue, Anacortes, WA 98221, and;

Guy Davidson, Registered Agent of Regal Hospitality, LLC; and original Windermere Anacortes listing agent of 401 Commercial Avenue, Anacortes, WA 98221.

The Causes of Action In Dunlap’s Complaint, are:

FRAUD “… The Defendants, or their agents or employees, represented that they would sell the property composed of Seven Thousand Five Hundred (7,500) square feet as understood by Plaintiff. This was a representation of an existing material fact that the Defendants knew was false, that was in fact false, and that the Defendants, intended the Plaintiff to rely upon, knowing full well that the Plaintiff was not aware of the truth of the matter.”

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT “… During the course of their operation of the business, defendants, Scott and Davidson, engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice by representing to Plaintiff and by continuously failing to inform Plaintiff that the property did not include Three Thousand (3,000) square feet of the Seven Thousand Five Hundred (7,500) square feet the Plaintiff understood would be included in the transaction, and as per the listing.”

NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION (IN THE ALTERNATIVE) “… The Defendants failed to disclose to the Plaintiff that the property did not include Three Thousand (3,000) square feet of the Seven Thousand Five Hundred (7,500) square feet that the Plaintiff understood would be included in the transaction, knowing that the Plaintiff would be induced to to purchase the property.”

BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTIES PURSUANT TO RCW 18.86 et seq. AND COMMON LAW NEGLIGENCE. “… Defendants Laws, Craig and Scott were negligent and breached their fiduciary duties of care owed to plaintiffs, including but not limited to the duty to exercise reasonable skill and care and to deal honestly and in good faith, and disclose material in violation of applicable common law and statutory duties.”

BREACH OF CONTRACT (IN THE ALTERNATIVE) "...Defendant Regal Hospitality, LLC is liable to the Plaintiff for breach of contract."

A Dream to Prosper and Grow in a Restored, Classic Old Anacortes Building...

In her well-crafted 401 PRESENTATION.pdf that we recommend you download and read, Ms. Dunlap writes: “Preserving Old Town Anacortes — One Building at a Time. I purchased 401 Commercial with a dream… Finance an amazing architectural project saving one more original 1900’s building from destruction.” Dunlap was going to operate her rising products operation and produce rental income from the historic, old Anacortes edifice she purchased through Windermere Anacortes.

But, as it is in so many other cases of Windermere Real Estate’s dishonest and predatory conduct, Dunlap’s entire own financial freedom, investment bankroll, credit, health and bright future in business have been ruined by Windermere’s primary predatory tactic—commit the crime, unethical misconduct or misrepresentation FIRST, and then FORCE the damaged, unsuspecting Windermere client to sue and spend literally EVERYTHING they have chasing Windermere crooks through endless legal maneuvers and the bankrupting cost of civil dispute litigation. Through her ordeal, Dunlap has experienced serious health complications and the loss of funding for her autistic child’s special needs therapy. And if you’ve ever used our dysfunctional legal system, you’ll know that the unyielding stress associated with constant, emotionally grueling legal disputes will manifest in serious, personal health events.

Dunlap’s articulate and detailed evidentiary 401 Presentation recounts an elaborate and convoluted scheme to defraud her—after the actual purchase—out of 3,000 square feet from a commercial building transaction in which she thought she legally purchased a total of 7500 square feet. There are questions about Chicago Title’s role in the controversy, as well.

In July of 2008, Dunlap offered on a commercial listing by Windermere Anacortes Realtor Guy Davidson, at 401 Commercial Avenue in downtown Anacortes. Dunlap had previously done business with Defendants Nathan Scott, Colleen Craig, and Meredith Laws of Windermere Anacortes Properties, and “…trusted their level of professionalism so did not question when the Commercial Purchase and Sale Agreement (CIREPSA) did not contain a copy of the listing to initial.” She received a commitment for title insurance from Chicago Title and compared it with Skagit County Public Records, which agreed on both descriptions. She commissioned a survey of the property based on the commitment for title insurance and the Skagit County Public Records for her tax parcel, and the parcel she intended to buy was clearly staked by a surveyor. The survey was then provided to Windermere agents Laws/Craig, and Chicago Title during feasibility. The survey identified an encroachment of .12 to .10 inches onto Seller/Windermere Realtor/Regal Hospitality Agent Guy Davidson’s adjoining Majestic Inn property; and it also encroached the adjoining city owned property.

Ms. Dunlap received an easement prepared by Windermere Anacortes Agents Laws/Craig, Chicago Title, and the Owner/Seller/Windermere Commercial Realtor Guy Davidson. The purchase closed at the Chicago Title office on August 22nd of 2008, but on August 26th, Dunlap found cars parked on her property.

In an email, she notified Scott, Craig and Laws that “… Somebody might want to alert the Majestic that the property they sold for 550k is no longer theirs.” She was then informed for the first time that the advertised listing that prompted her offer was “…not supposed to be posted” and was ‘…supposed to have been removed from Windermere’s Commercial Web Site in 2007.” Yet the listing had still not been removed 5 days after her own closing. Windermere Anacortes’ Nate Scott confirmed that the listing had indeed been live [on the internet], but said it should have been cancelled. In what appears a ridiculous, gobbledygook, Realtor agglomeration dance of meaningless mumbo-jumbo, Nate Scott replied in the email, “Yes, the listing on that site, not controlled by us, was a listing of that property from 2006, cancelled in mid-2007. The new listing, WHICH ALSO SHOWED UP (Editor’s emphasis added.), was listed in early 2008 and had 4,500 sq ft, and was the listing that showed on any other site out there. We don’t know why the old listing didn't come off that site, but have asked them to explain.” Scott concluded his email to Dunlap with, “…I understand this isn’t a great moment for you…”

Dunlap has proof that property owner/seller Guy Davidson was managing a CBA listing for the property on 1/24/08, with an expiration date of 9/30/08. In fact, there is also evidence that Davidson updated the listing on 8/26/08 to reflect its having been sold on 8/22/08. Yet Guy Davidson denied under oath to having managed the listing at all. Dunlap was further informed that the word “partial” was inserted after the tax parcel number in the Purchase Agreement Legal Description, and was intended to inform her that the tax parcel would be subdivided upon closing to convey 3,000 square feet less than was advertised. In her presentation, Dunlap states “I was Informed for the 1st Time that: 3. Allegedly a ‘Revised Commitment for Title Insurance’ was created on July 14th 2008 to correct errors I found 8 DAYS BEFORE I RECEIVED THE PRELIMINARY COMMITMENT.” (Editor’s emphasis added.)

In a questionable Declaration—the unsworn Declaration being one of Windermere’s most dubious, murky tools—Chicago Title’s Mary Mansfield spontaneously and mysteriously declares, “The legal description in that Preliminary Title Commitment was in error and was subsequently corrected.”

Dunlap found Chicago Title’s amended commitment lacked several components. And Interestingly, the amended Second Commitment For Title Insurance was signed not by the prior Title Officer, Kauleen Shelton—who signed Dunlap’s initial Commitment For Title Insurance—but by an individual about whom Dunlap was later told by Chicago Title Escrow Officer Mary Mansfield, did not work there anymore—Mansfield told Dunlap she could not divulge the mystery individual’s contact information because it was none of her business and not part of her sale; Mansfield said that the employee had been terminated and there was no contact information available.

Dunlap’s closing agreement and escrow instructions made no mention of a Second Commitment for Title Insurance, but instead referenced the Preliminary Commitment for Title Insurance. She was then presented with a SUPPLEMENT to the closing agreement and escrow instructions on August 27th, 2008—five days after closing—and the supplement only referenced the Preliminary Commitment for Title Insurance. So the obvious question arises: Why, at that late date, wouldn’t the supplement reflect the alleged Second Commitment for Title Insurance which was created on July 14th, 2008?

Sellers and Dunlap were both required to initial provision 3, specifically reiterating that the contract was based on the Preliminary Commitment for Title Insurance. Also on August 27, 2008, Dunlap was informed for the for the first time that her Windermere agents Meredith Laws and Colleen Craig were alleged to be the “Exclusive Listing Agents for the Property"—dual agency requiring disclosure by law, but not disclosed to Dunlap. Windermere Anacortes Realtor and Majestic/Regal Registered Agent Seller Guy Davidson was represented as the listing agent on all advertisements Dunlap had ever seen. In research, she established that Laws/Craig had an on-and-off history with the property in question. Evidence shows that a 2006 listing of the 401 Commercial property was listed with Laws/Craig, and then apparently transferred to Nate Scott the same day.

Also on August 27, 2008, Dunlap says she was informed that her Purchase Agreement was allegedly drafted from a “2nd LISTING FOR THE PROPERTY (CONTAINING 4500 SQ FT LESS LAND) (Editor’s emphasis added.) even though it was never represented to me before closing, not included as part of the Purchase Agreement & not made available to the public.” No copy of the listing, copy of the deed, or official representation was included as part of her purchase agreement.

In a Memorandum in support of her claims filed with the court, Ms. Dunlap states “Chicago Title has refused to honor the Title Insurance citing the creation of a fraudulent ‘Second Commitment for Title Insurance’ allegedly created on July 14th 2008 because of the error I discovered on August 21st 2008 — which seems physically impossible without the aid of time travel.”

Time travel or not, Windermere and Demco Law will no-doubt trek all the way up to the state supreme court, in an effort to prove H. G. Wells’ Time Machine is a real contraption of which Windermere Real Estate / Anacortes Properties, Chicago Title, and Guy Davidson have all availed themselves of while dealing with Wendelin Dunlap of Skagit County. To really understand this complicated Windermere case, we again recommend Ms. Dunlap’s 401 Presentation. Litigation is ongoing in this case, and Dunlap lists her total damages at $1,346,121.86.

Just by forcing an unsuspecting, victimized Windermere client through our expensive, unjust, and corrupt legal system, Public Predator Windermere Real Estate has interrupted and ruined yet another innocent individual’s happy and healthy life. Windermere personnel initially strike unsuspecting consumers first by committing these outrageous schemes and ethical crimes, while the victims are then forced by Windermere to chase their crooks through the courts for years. Then Windermere goes right on collecting commissions and fees from those very agents, brokers, and franchise owners which it already knows affirmatively are unethical and dishonest real estate people.

Don’t let it happen to you. If your 're currently doing business with Windermere through any office in any state where Windermere operates, protect your life and assets by cancelling or not renewing your Windermere listing. If you're considering doing business with Windermere at any time in the future, consider very, very carefully.

________________________________

 

The Windermere Real Estate Relocation Rape Case:

Court Declares that Windermere "...condoned a rape by a business colleague..."

 

Editorial Preface: The incredibly violent and insidious psychological ramifications of rape, connected through an “abusive work environment” serves as an unfortunate yet credible subtext for the way in which Windermere Real Estate treats employees and damaged customers alike: Windermere’s application of aggressive, wasteful and mendacious litigation to stall and ruin innocent consumers, serves as the coercive metaphor of corporate power and arrogance: Windermere has no concern for the social damage it has done to people or communities. It cares only about how to manipulate the law and the courts to avoid any legal responsibility.

 

(Above L to R) Windermere CEO Geoff Wood (far left) is currently listed as a Governing Person of Windermere Relocation. Peggy Scott (second from left), also a current Governing Person of Windermere Relocation, "... did not give Little any advice about going to the police, and she did not conduct an investigation of Little's complaint or any follow-up interview with Little." Windermere General Counsel, attorney Paul Drayna (third from left) is listed as the registered agent of RELO LLC, the current entity name of Windermere Relocation. Windermere Founder John W. Jacobi (fourth from left) along with Gayle Glew (far right) are listed as Governing Persons of Windermere Relocation during the Little case. Glew told Ms. Little he did not want any "clouds in the office," and subsequently, after she would not accept a pay cut, that she should clean out her desk.

All citizens who abhor such treatment of women in the workplace should recall Maureen Little v. Windermere Relocation when choosing real estate services. WindermereWatch visitors will also want to read the United States District Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit's Order and Amended Opinion from the Little case.

 

Summarized and excerpted from a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals

 

Maureen Little was employed by Windermere Relocation Services (“Windermere”) as a Corporate Services Manager, a position that required her “to develop an ongoing business relationship and relocation contacts with corporations in order to obtain corporate clients needing relocation services for their employees.” Until she was terminated, she received only positive feedback from her supervisors. Windermere’s records confirm that during the relevant period, Little had the best transaction closure record of all corporate managers by a large margin.

Unlike the other managers, Little’s employment contract provided that Little would receive $2,000 monthly, plus a $1,000 monthly override and $250 per closed sale. The override was based on the assumption that Little would close four transactions per month, with a provision for rollover when she did not make the target. According to Windermere President Gayle Glew, the other managers had not received the $1,000 override.

One of Windermere’s clients was the Starbucks Corporation. Some time in 1997, Little performed some relocation services for Starbucks Human Resources Director, Dan Guerrero, on a contract basis, and she learned from him that Starbucks was dissatisfied with its primary relocation provider. Glew told Little that he would “do whatever it takes to get this account” and that Little should “do the best job she could.” Thus, little believed that, as part of her job, she was to build a business relationship with Guerrero to try and get the Starbucks account, and she had at least two business lunches with Guerrero toward this end.

On October 14, Little accepted Guerrero’s invitation to discuss the account at a restaurant. After eating dinner with Guerrero and having a couple of drinks, Little suddenly became ill and passed out. She awoke to find herself being raped by Guerrero in his car. She fought him off and jumped out of the car, but again she became violently ill. Guerrero put her back in the car and took her to his apartment, where he raped her again. Little fell asleep, and when she awoke he was raping her again. Afterward, he showered and drover her to her car.

Little was reluctant to tell anyone at Windermere about the rape because, in her own words, “I knew how important the Starbucks account was to Mr. Glew. Mr. Glew would ask me on a consistent basis the status of the account and I was afraid that if I told him about the rape, he would see me as an impediment to obtaining the Starbucks account.” This belief was reinforced when, a few days after the rape, Little reported the rape to Chris Delay, Director of Relocation Services (apparently not one of Little’s supervisors), and Delay advised her not to tell anyone in management. Little believed that Delay feared “what might happen to [Little] if [she] did tell.”

On October 23, about nine days after the rape, Little reported it to Peggy Scott, the Vice President of Operations, who was designated in Windermere’s Harassment Policy as a complaint-receiving manager. Little described Scott’s response:

She came out around the desk and I could tell she was upset and she just gave me a hug and said she wished there was something she could do. She didn't understand what I was going through. She asked me if I was in therapy. Then she proceeded to tell me she wouldn't say anything to [Glew] unless I proceeded to seek legal action [against Dan Guerrero].

 

Scott told Little that "[s]he thought it would be best that [Little] try to put it behind [her] and to keep working in therapy," and that she should discontinue working on the Starbucks account. She did not give Little any advice about going to the police, and she did not conduct an investigation of Little's complaint or any follow-up interview with Little. Scott testified in her deposition that, because the rape occurred outside the "working environment," she believed that it fell outside the scope of Windermere's Harassment Policy.

 

Despite Little's supposed removal from the Starbucks account, Glew continued to ask her about the status of the Starbucks account during the next six weeks. "[As of December 2,] Gayle was asking me questions about Starbucks ... a couple of times every month to see what the status was." Concerned by Glew's questions, Little told her immediate supervisor, Linda Bellisario, the Vice President of Sales and Marketing, on December 2, 1997, about the rape. Little had been reluctant to tell Bellisario because she "felt that [Bellisario] would immediately go to Gayle and Gayle would terminate my position.... I knew how much this account meant to him. He said he would do whatever it took to get this account." Bellisario told Little to inform Glew of the incident.

 

When Little told Glew of the rape, which, according to Glew, was the first he had heard of it, Glew's" immediate response was that he did not want to hear anything about it." He told Little that she would have to respond to his attorneys. Glew then informed her that he was restructuring her salary from $3,000 monthly to $2,000 monthly plus $250 per closed transaction. The pay reduction was effective immediately and non-negotiable. Bellisario, who was present at that portion of the meeting, appeared "surprised and upset" to Little.

 

Little found the pay cut unacceptable, and Glew told her to go home for two days to think it over "because he did not want any `clouds in the office.'" When Little still found the pay cut unacceptable two days later, Glew told her it would be best if she moved on and that she should clean out her desk.

 

Little brought suit against Windermere, alleging unlawful discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the Revised Code of Washington § 49.60; wrongful discharge in violation of public policy; and intentional, reckless, and/or negligent infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Windermere on all four claims.

 

Little appealed dismissal of her claims, and the appeals court reversed in part, and ruled:

 

In sum, taking the facts in the light most favorable to Little, because her employer effectively condoned a rape by a business colleague and its effects, Little was subjected to an abusive work environment that "detract[ed] from [her] job performance, discourage[d] [her] from remaining on the job, [and kept her] from advancing in [her] career[]."

 

Incredibly, Windermere asked for a rehearing, but "...the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

 

 

 

WINDERMERE: AMERICA'S PREDATORY REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISE

Consumer advocates, legal experts and elected lawmakers all agree that the American real estate industry demands greater regulation to protect consumers from the human disaster of real estate fraud perpetrated by unethical realtors employed at companies like Windermere Real Estate. Windermere manipulates our clogged, inundated courts and the justice system to stall, wear down and financially exhaust victimized consumers, many of whom are wiped-out by the cost of pursuing civil justice in a process where innocent victims must CHASE perpetrators of real estate fraud through the courts AFTER a fraudulent offense has been committed. Acts of fraud are so common and widespread throughout the Windermere real estate network, that the defense of real estate fraud has become has become just another bottomline expense on the Windermere balance sheet. And the litigation nightmare of real estate fraud can happen to anyone who deals with Windermere Real Estate. It could happen to you. Windermere is by far the most unethical, deceitful, and culturally toxic real estate company operating in the United States. Windermere knowingly, deliberately, and unabashedly profits on corrupt franchise owners, brokers and agents with proven histories of fraud and ethical misconduct, many of whom are profiled in the pages of WindermereWatch.com. Despite Windermere's well-documented assault on victim speech rights, more and more unconscionable cases of Windermere fraud continue emerging.

Windermere is headquartered in Seattle, at franchiser Windermere Services Company. It was founded by John W. Jacobi, and he has kept the company a private, family-owned enterprise, eluding the transparency and ethical accountability required by stockholders. For decades, Windermere has harnessed the art of positive PR, affixing itself—however superficially—to community art events, the homeless, and even an annual college rowing competition which opens Seattle's boating season—the Windermere Cup—irresponsibly promoted by, and in conjunction with, the University of Washington. But those are the disingenuous and cynical sideshows created by an adept market manipulator, shown only briefly to the public, to obscure and obfuscate Windermere's true predatory nature.

FRANCHISER WINDERMERE SERVICES' MANAGEMENT TEAM AND DESIGNATED GOVERNING PEOPLE: EXPERTS IN MARKETING FRAUD, ABUSE OF THE LEGAL PROCESS, AND AT COERCING DAMAGED WINDERMERE CLIENTS INTO SILENCE BY SUPPRESSING THEIR SPEECH RIGHTS

The shameless greed and repugnant ethics of Seattle's Jacobi family, deliberately profiting on the loss and suffering of Windermere victims through commissions on the fraudulent home deals and unlawful misconduct of dishonest Windermere agents, brokers and franchise owners. Forget human decency, commercial reputation or social responsibility—it's all about the money.

Before turning the business over to his children and son-in-law, Windermere founder John W. Jacobi (left) simply ignored any complaints of fraud from Windermere victims, sending them straight to the lawyers. Yet despite claims of retirement, Jacobi is still indeed quite active at franchiser Windermere Services Company:

In Complaint 10-2-36192-8 SEA, filed in King County Superior Court on October 12, 2010, Windermere Services Company has sued former Windermere Puyallup Canyon Road owner Joe Maxwell for default on an “Unconditional Guaranty of Payment” promissory note. The Maxwell Answer and Counterclaims state that the “Plaintiff's [Windermere Services Company] claims are barred by Plaintiff’s fraud, duress, and unclean hands,” and alleges $4,000,000 in damages and violation of Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act; and also that "The alleged Note and Guarantee are unconscionable and unenforceable." Maxwell's Counterclaims state "6. The WPCR Operating Agreement contains a provision granting Jacobi a special veto power which among other things, states that the company shall conduct its business and manage its affairs in accordance with the directions of Jacobi and all management decisions are subject to Jacobi’s review," and "13. In early 2006, WSC and Jacobi decided to open another WSC office in the territory in which WPCR was operating, despite the objections of Maxwell. As a result of the opening of this new WSC office, WPCR lost a significant number of its real estate agents and revenue that transferred to the new office in Graham, Washington," and "14. As a direct result of these actions taken by WSC and Jacobi, WPCR was left with a large debt burden and overhead, and WPCR’s revenue was significantly reduced... 22. On September 14, 2010, Maxwell heard from a real estate agent working at WPCR that the agent had received and email from WSC notifying him WPCR’s franchise had been terminated. This notice was sent to WPCR’s real estate agents before Maxwell learned of the termination of WPCR’s franchise." Read the complete report on this case here.

Jacobi's Washington Loan Company is also currently being sued for Intentional Misrepresentation—read that report here. And the Windermere affiliated service company, Commonwealth Land Title Company of Puget Sound, has recently been found negligent by a jury who awarded the third-party plaintiffs $1,190,000. Read the Commonwealth report here.

 

Current Governing Person and Windermere Services Company CEO Geoffrey P. Wood (left) is married to John W. Jacobi's daughter, Jill Jacobi-Wood. Wood is the chief architect of Windermere marketing fraud, inducing business volume through—among other fraudulent promotion—an express warranty of "The highest ethical standards. Uncompromising honesty and integrity." When called upon to honor his company's warranty, Wood instructs Demco lawyers—led by Matthew F. Davis–to sue vocal victims for libel and defamation. Wood is also a Governing Person of Windermere Relocation, the subject enterprise of Windermere's employee rape case. He was briefly a real estate sales person in 1994, but that license was CANCELLED in 1995, and Wood currently has no real estate license of any kind that WindermereWatch can find.

 

Governing Person Jill Jacobi-Wood (left), Windermere Services President, is a licensed real estate broker in Washington State, and as such is subject to the statutory condition of RCW 18.86.030 "(d) To deal honestly and in good faith." For her part in Windermere's marketing fraud and malfeasance, Jacobi-Wood's RE license should be cancelled by the Washington State DOL's real estate division. By promoting honesty and integrity—while in reality—she is suing and coercing Windermere victims to shutup about their Windermere experience, Jacobi-Wood is hardly dealing honestly and in good faith.

 

 

Governing Person John O'Brien "OB"Jacobi (left) is General Manager of franchiser Windermere Services Company and also has many Windermere realty brokerage offices. He's a licensed real estate broker who is also called upon by statutory law to "Deal honestly and in good faith." But John "OB" Jacobi instead promotes fraudulent claims of honesty and integrity, and falsely sues victims of Windermere misconduct for libel and defamation to intimidate them and coerce their silence. Then this junior Jacobi runs away and voluntarily dismisses his own mendacious lawsuit when a victim refuses to sign Windermere's dark clause settlement agreement that has cost the victimized party so much distress and money and to defend.

 

 

Windermere Services Governing Person and attorney—WSBA# 26636—Paul Drayna (left) has even more stringent ethical requirements placed upon him through his collateral professions of Lawyer and Notary Public; and Drayna is also bound by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct. But Mr. Drayna is not just practicing marketing fraud at Windermere. As Windermere in-house counsel, Drayna oversees Windermere's legal strategy of abusing process by falsely suing victims for libel and defamation, and then attempting to intimidate and coerce those victims out of their speech rights and into Windermere's Dark Clause silence agreement. When victims WON'T sign the Windermere Dark Clause, Drayna runs away too, and voluntarily dismisses his own company's lawsuit under Civil Rule 41—but only after first costing the victim thousands to defend the phony lawsuit. Drayna is even copied on the mendacious, Demco-authored settlement documents meant to quash speech rights and be signed by Windermere victims.

 

WINDERMERE'S DEMCO LAW FIRM: ESCHEWING ETHICS and DOING WHAT OTHER LAWYERS JUST WON'T DO

 

Attorney and multi-office Windermere broker John Demco (left) is the ethically-elastic Windermere kingpin lawyer who operates Demco Law, Windermere’s in-house legal firm, whose primary job is to stall and outspend small fry consumers damaged by dishonest Windermere brokers, agents and franchise owners. When an innocent real estate consumer has the misfortune to suffer one of Windermere’s many bad apples, Demco Law Firm will refuse to settle the matter forthrightly, no matter what conspicuously unlawful or offensive conduct the agent or broker has committed. Demco and Windermere will force the aggrieved party to sue or swallow their damage and go away—standard Windermere operating procedure.

 

WindermereWatch has compiled voluminous evidence that Windermere-Demco attorney Matthew F. Davis (left), WSBA# 20939, is the kind of lawyer about which jokes are coined. Davis is franchiser Windermere Services' frontline bully—the guy in the legal trenches actually wrecking lives, making threats, and suing victims who speak out. When Shakespeare was recommending "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers," in Henry the Sixth, Part 2, he was talking about egomaniacal lawyers like Matt Davis.

Attorney Matt Davis of Windermere's Demco Law Firm is so unethical, so deceitful and intimidating, that he's famous in law circles. As Windermere-Demco's lead attorney, Matthew F. Davis is renown for his dishonesty, dubious legal tactics, lack of decency and disrespect for the rules of professional conduct. He will do absolutely anything to win—without regard for truth or justice. He will lie to courts and opposing parties. He will file fallacious and erroneous documents with the court. He will email opposing parties telling them not to hire a lawyer when he has just served them a lawsuit. He will call a judge's chambers and request more time without informing the opposing party. He will file orders for a bench trial when he knows a jury trial has been demanded and paid for. He will trick, stall, coerce, menace and threaten. He will invent and extend mendacious Windermere litigation and abuse the legal process for no other reason than to exhaust an opponent’s pocketbook. If he can, he will get YOUR attorney to quit—a favorite tactic.

Windermere, Davis and Demco Law will push a $5 cat poop case all the way to the state supreme court just to avoid paying damages—because it’s all in the Windermere operating budget. And in the end, Windermere and Davis will try to coerce silence about your Windermere experience by trying to make you sign a "settlement" agreement that terminates your speech rights, so you can't ever inform the public about your Windermere debacle. What if you DON'T sign that you'll shut up, and then SPEAK UP instead? Windermere-Demco's Matt Davis will sue you for libel and defamation, then run away and dismiss his own lawsuit on the eve of trial—because after all—you're telling the truth.

Windermere's Clear and Overt Marketing Fraud:

"THE HIGHEST ETHICAL STANDARDS. UNCOMPROMISING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY."

—The Windermere Real Estate Mission Statement

Windermere widely promotes its deceptive express warranty in sales documents and on the internet which states "We are committed to... The highest ethical standards. Uncompromising honesty and integrity." In other Windermere promotion, like the Puget Sound Business Journal, Windermere CEO Geoff Wood is quoted as saying "In the real estate business somebody's word is very important. If you say you're going to do something, you've got to do it." The article goes on to say, "Geoff oversees marketing, legal, financial and internet development services throughout the Windermere network..." Mr. Wood claims absolute dominion over both Windermere legal and internet strategy, making him chief architect of Windermere marketing fraud.

Effective reportage can be harsh in recounting facts, but it must be said in consideration of all the Windermere victims profiled here who truly sought Windermere's vaunted honesty and integrity, that Windermere Services CEO Geoffrey P. Wood is simply lying when he states his company's utterly false and fraudulent commitment to honesty and integrity. He both lies and deceives again when he says that "In the real estate business somebody's word is very important. If you say you're going to do something, you've got to do it." Wood clearly doesn't do what he says he's going to do—be committed to uncompromising honesty and integrity. Wood himself is indeed IN the real estate business and his word is absolutely no good at all. He sues victims of Windermere misconduct for trade libel and defamation to shut them up, and then he tries to use the legal system to suppress victims' speech rights when they ask him to actually perform on the warranty he promotes. As this website proves, Mr. Wood does anything BUT what he says he's gonna do. Far from providing victimized Windermere customers a commitment to high ethical standards, honesty and integrity, Wood and Windermere run away and hide behind their lawyers when innocent consumers are ruined by their Windermere experience.

John W. Jacobi, Geoff Wood, his wife Jill Jacobi-Wood, and governing cohorts John O'brien "OB" Jacobi and attorney Paul Drayna have gone to the absolute ends of the earth in stonewalling, ignoring, denying and fleeing any and all responsibility for Windermere wrongdoing and misconduct. When called upon by victimized Windermere consumers to make good on its warranty of honesty and integrity, Windermere even states in legal pleadings that Windermere agents are NOT agents of Windermere at all—but independent contractors. As the legally-designated Governing People and top managers of the Windermere empire who drive policy, ethics and market promotion, it demands repeating that John W, Jacobi, Geoff Wood, Jill Jacobi-Wood, John OB Jacobi and attorney Paul Drayna are all clearly lying when they promise high ethical standards and uncompromising honesty to the public and consumers of real estate services.

Protect your life, home, family and future by cancelling or not renewing your Windermere listing. Don't risk doing business with Windermere Real Estate, the brand built on lies, fraud and ruined lives. Refuse to fund public predator Windermere Real Estate with commission from the sale of your home.

 

________________________________

 

Is WindermereWatch.com of social benefit to consumers and the public? You decide:

Windermere Real Estate is one of our country’s largest real estate companies and widely promotes a fraudulent express warranty that states “We are committed to... The highest ethical standards. Uncompromising honesty and integrity.” The definition of an express warranty from Black's Law Dictionary is: "A warranty created by the overt words or actions of the seller. • Under the UCC, an express warranty is created by any of the following: (1) an affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer relating to the goods that becomes the basis of the bargain."

But when customers are victimized by dishonest Windermere brokers and agents, and complain in writing through legal counsel to franchiser Windermere Services Company, it is absolutely silent in the face of clear and convincing evidence, and forces the customer to sue or go away. In many cases, unsuspecting consumer lives are thrown into complete chaos through costly litigation; and also because the subject homes may actually be uninhabitable or unserviceable for reasons about which Windermere knew and had a legal obligation to disclose—but did not. For some victims, the long and expensive litigation forced upon them even results in bankruptcy and homelessness. Despite their clear evidence, many victims go on to lose in court because they can't afford attorneys or have no legal experience, and Windermere exploits those impediments to endless advantage—lives, homes, and personal finances are ruined forever. And Windermere expects those victims to just go away without their lives and homes, merely for buying a house through Windermere Real Estate, innocently.

Although such irrefutable evidence of Windermere broker/agent misconduct has been presented to franchiser Windermere Services Company, it knowingly continues collecting commissions from dishonest agents and brokers by deliberately passing them on to other unwitting consumers. Just one example is Windermere S.C.A. Redmond's Paul Stickney, who received a $522,200 court judgment for not disclosing a conflict of interest, but is still producing commissions for his Windermere SCA franchise, and Windermere Services Company. Is that the "Highest ethical standards. Uncompromising honesty and integrity?" You may want to search and visit more websites about Windermere's predatory business conduct.

When victims use the media to report their Windermere experiences honestly, Windermere sues them for libel and defamation through false lawsuits to intimidate, silence, and hush bad PR—read one of those lawsuits here. It then tries to coerce victims into signing a “dark clause settlement agreement” that permanently terminates their speech rights—read some of those "settlement" agreements here. Through an expensive and emotionally distressing roller coaster ride with Windermere's nasty Demco lawyers, a victim of Windermere fraud is told they will be taken all the way to trial on trumped-up libel and defamation charges, and if they don't sign the dark clause, their life and future will be ruined. When a victim persists in refusing to sign, Windermere voluntarily dismisses its own lawsuit under Civil Rule 41, just before trial, after costing the victim years and yet thousands more to defend against the false action. This predatory legal tactic is known as abuse of process or malicious prosecution. In one example cited below, franchiser Windermere Services Company served an outspoken victim a lawsuit for libel and defamation, and then immediately sent them an email instructing that they "...need not hire an attorney," and further stating, “…we will try to resolve this directly and outside the legal system.”

Every Windermere office in every state is legally tied to franchiser Windermere Services Company's fraudulent express warranty, false advertising, predatory conduct and policies through privity and its pecuniary franchise agreement. Some legal observers believe that Windermere's conduct has RICO and Civil Rights violation implications. If you have recently purchased a Windermere franchise without having been disclosed Windermere's falling brand value, PR decline, and its adverse website problems, click here for its duty of disclosure under Federal Trade Commission rules. Proof that Windermere Services Company knew about WindermereWatch.com in March of 2007 is in this document.

Windermere Real Estate is a textbook corporate predator who operates franchises in Washington State, Oregon, California, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Hawaii and British Columbia. Windermere repeatedly makes the false claim that it has offices in Wyoming, but it does not. If you’re buying or selling property through ANY Windermere office, a percentage from your transaction will be used by franchiser Windermere Services Company to silence and financially ruin innocent parties who’ve encountered Windermere fraud. Windermere won't pay legitimate damages or acknowledge wrongdoing, and will stall settlement of cases all the way to state supreme courts, a legal strategy that Windermere routinely employs to bankrupt victims and exhaust their resources.

We believe the information presented here is of profound social benefit to consumers and the community, and we are dedicated to providing it.

THROUGH FEES AND COMMISSIONS PAID TO FRANCHISER WINDERMERE SERVICES COMPANY, EVERY WINDERMERE NETWORK OFFICE IN EVERY STATE IS AN ENTHUSIASTIC PARTNER AND KNOWING ACCESSORY TO WINDERMERE MARKETING FRAUD AND ITS PREDATORY POLICIES

(Back to top)